The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.
The first chart illustrates the real percentage buses of a particular concern that arrived at the destination on time compared to the target of that firm, between 1999 and 2003. Meanwhile, the second depicts how many gravamens were sent during the same period.
It is clear that the actual and target proportion of buses coming punctually decreased over the years while the number of complaints from their customer went up throughout the period.
According to the first bar chart, in 1999, the company's target of buses reaching on time stood at 86%, which was slightly higher 1% than what was actually achieved. Although the goal remained unchanged one year later, the number of buses followed exactly on the schedule dropped by 3%. In the last year of the report, this company had gone down its target on-time arrivals to over 84%, whilst the actual figure was received a growth but it was still lower than itself in the first year.
As can be seen from the second chart, starting at around 7% of total passengers in 1999, the number of complaints made by passengers rose significantly before experiencing a little fall to just over 8% in 2001. This data then grew considerably two years later, with almost 12% of passengers complaining in the final period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8976744186 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53590335798 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0029068785 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.625 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244560055122 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940291791904 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761544012818 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129014387749 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632523276498 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.