The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts give information on the language abilities of British students at a university in the UK in 2000 and 2010. Overall, it is noticeable that students who could only speak English accounted for the largest proportion throughout the given period.
In 2000, 10% of the British students were able to use 2 languages other than their own mother tongue, which was a third of the proportion of students who can only speak English. Meanwhile, The percentage of students who can speak French or another language was slighly higher, at 15% each while the figure for Spanish speakers was 20%.
10 years later, the proportion of students who could use one foreign language excluding French, Spanish, and German rose by 5% to 20%. Similarly, the figures for monolinguals and trilinguals also increased to 20% and 30% respectively. By contrast, the percentage of Frech speakers decreased by 5% while that of Spanish dropped by a half. On the other hand, the figure for German users remained unchanged at 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | wbj | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-21 | nguyenthanhloc | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | Behnaz.babayani | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Wulan | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s who can only speak English. Meanwhile, The percentage of students who can speak...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95882352941 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74214196579 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3518340771 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377725359567 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152522195979 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12528309375 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266070003914 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106120754834 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.