The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

The two pie charts given demonstrate how many British students at an England university who are bilingual or multilingual in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, students in this university who are able to speak English only account for the highest percentage, and there were slight increase after ten years. Meanwhile, the proportion of student who can speak French and Spanish only decreased. Another key feature is that German speakers were reported the lower number and unchanged over time.
In 2000, nearly a third of British students in this university were capable of using their mother tongue only, followed by 20% who could speak Spanish. The percentage of students using French and other language were equal, at 15%. This figure for bilingual students or German users was the same rate, at 10%, which is the lowest of total students.
After a decade, English-speaking still dominated in this university, which 35% of students using this language only. Spanish and French users, however, occupied lower percentages in 2010, with its figure declined by 5% each. Conversely, the year 2010 witnessed a decrease of 5% in the proportion of another or two other language speakers. Only the number of German speakers stayed static, still at 10%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-03 trpg143 70 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user nguyenthanhloc :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, still, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16417910448 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64798161596 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9657405521 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399663888779 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144076665569 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901351832602 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248434583061 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481168077212 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.