Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The last few years have witnessed the advent of international trade and better transportation, product accessibility is no longer restricted because of geographical barriers. This essay is to pinpoint both the advantages and disadvantages to this development before concluding how it is.
Admittedly, the benefits attached to product accessibility are definite. One positive impact is that business and individual consumer can purchase native product when they are abroad. For example, shop like McDonald's and KFC can be found on the high streets of most major cities, and tourists guaranteed the same quality and standard of product wherever they are. Undoubtedly, having such an approachable way helps them feel at home. Another advantage is to diversify the product choices for consumers. For instance, a Vietnamese girl can make up which cosmetics produced locally such as Moi or with Korean products of ETUDE house and Missha or Vichy - a French cosmetic brand.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits associated with buying the same product anywhere in the world, I am convinced that they are eclipsed by following drawbacks. This trend may lead to cultural loss. For example, Japan gains a reputation for wooden house structure with tiled or thatched roofs while France is typified by modern designed houses with glass, so similar architectures in different countries could erode local culture, and the sane effect will happen if people can buy similar product anywhere in the world. Also, this trend discourages traveling since people will less curious about the distinctive feature of other nations. This argument can be exemplified by the fact that people can sample Pho - a cuisine in Vietnam - ubiquitously, so some foreign food lovers will lose interest in visiting Vietnam for this reason.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the fact that countries are become indistinguishable helps people living overseas wipe out their homesickness, however i believe that the drawback of it, this can also result in local culture erosion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon 73
- The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emission per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1976 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...as wipe out their homesickness, however i believe that the drawback of it, this c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49523809524 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06175155978 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663492063492 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4765338078 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27291922449 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079099215374 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447063802221 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142197549796 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514879375463 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.