The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other language in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other language in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where is relevant

The pie presents in percentage how many adolescents from one university in UK were able to speak as well other language than English in 2000 and 2010. At the first glance at the picture we can see that those who speak only Spanish had the biggest slice in both given years.
If those who are speaking Spanish had 30 percent in 2000 and after 10 years were increased with 10 percent those who are speaking just English are in 2000 20 % but in 2010 feel a decrease with 10 percentage.
In 2000 and 2010 only those who learn German remain stable.
The categories of those who are speaking other language or two other languages had increase with 5 percent each one from 15 to 20 respectively from 10 to 15.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-24 adnana121 56 view
Essays by user adnana121 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nglish are in 2000 20 % but in 2010 feel a decrease with 10 percentage. In 2000 ...
^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecrease with 10 percentage. In 2000 and 2010 only those who learn German remain...
^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with 10 percentage. In 2000 and 2010 only those who learn German remain stabl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 577.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 130.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43846153846 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37664837539 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34364820448 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 167.4 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1190191089 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259192441765 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151592540868 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632083133912 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16300767984 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568959120389 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.