The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts featured in task 1 illustrate the proportion of British students at one university in England who were capable of communicating in other languages different from English for the period of two years in 2000 and 2010.
First of all, let us look at the year 2000. According to the chart, only 70% of the total number of students were actively included in other languages interaction. The most popular way of communication was in the Spanish language with 20% students included. Turning to the other languages showed in the chart, one can observe that French was on the second place with 15% of students being involved. As for German language, students demonstrated the interest with the total number of 10% which is the same as the occupation with another language and two other languages data for the same year.
Moving onto the second chart for the year 2010, we can notice that the number of students included in language programs dropped for 5% and, as a result, reached 65% in total. In this period, the most popular language other than English was French showing a slight increase in comparison to 2001. It is followed by German with 10% of students taking part in the course and concluded with two other languages and another language with 10% students on the program, respectively.
If we analyze the data from the chart, we can clearly observe that interest of the students for other languages hasn't changed drastically over the two years. Except the fact that total proportion of students involved in language course slightly decreased, we cannot see any dramatic fluctuation in the total level of students attending the language classes.
Overall, one could say that generally young people were willing to participate in other language education, which consequently leads to the conclusion that language courses were enough engaging in the aforementioned years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and materialpossessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seemimportant.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- the graph below shows consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 31
- The graph below shows consumption of three spreads 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...tudents were actively included in other languages interaction. The most popular way of co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...ion with another language and two other languages data for the same year. Moving onto ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'as for', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249283667622 0.268076937826 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.126074498567 0.116061578633 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0945558739255 0.0759168565197 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0315186246418 0.0366838410393 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0171919770774 0.0131127313244 131% => OK
Prepositions: 0.174785100287 0.155750635184 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0458452722063 0.0379272487307 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71240495532 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0143266475645 0.0210936926555 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.114613180516 0.0948980150116 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0143266475645 0.00437022459523 328% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114613180516 0.00967000014798 119% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1894.0 1161.00487805 163% => OK
No of words: 311.0 196.9 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09003215434 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.73763899035 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389067524116 0.337110787985 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299035369775 0.247514529752 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225080385852 0.171178102325 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109324758842 0.112407865282 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71240495532 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488745980707 0.546246751206 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.8321991609 49.3433353143 99% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9166666667 23.0094962315 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4681781866 42.9750493124 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.833333333 135.714022679 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 23.0094962315 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.689975730869 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 55.8202036442 47.7609492067 117% => OK
Elegance: 2.68852459016 2.94281807926 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540960912755 0.418131533498 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163177423041 0.181151798455 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0817460848308 0.0850326197045 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.718767388176 0.706616315825 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165448426111 0.157042692854 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.288071344732 0.228904883108 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915957472769 0.108899403657 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.467731356583 0.367819155151 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.152501234866 0.0812612215331 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.396550615201 0.316326947829 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104193774343 0.0921553760075 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70731707317 243% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.16585365854 284% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 7.1512195122 168% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.