The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010

The charts give information about the rate of students in a university who can speak languages different in England in 200 and in 2010
Overall, Spanish was an increase in the percentage of student spoke in a university. In additionly, with the exception of French’s figure, all the proportion individual who were able to speak more than one language rose during the period,
In 2000, 30% students were able spoke Spanish in a university, which accounted for the highest rate of people can speak other languages. Meanwhile, the proportion of person who can not speak other language than English stoot at 20%. In the same time, the percentage of student speaking French’s and other languages were aqual, 15% respectively. Likewise, only 10% of people speke german or two other languages.
In contrast, during 2010, the proportion of people who do not know any other language and French’s decreased 10% respectively while German figure remained stable at 10%. The rate of person who able speak Spanish rose slight to 35%. At the same time, the percentage of people who can speak another languages and two other languages increased by 5% to 20% and 15% respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 ppatel 73 view
2020-01-07 Duong Linh 61 view
2019-12-24 nguyentuananh76 67 view
2019-12-17 Jesslynindah 84 view
2019-12-01 Gre user 78 view
Essays by user Thom Le :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...t spoke in a university. In additionly, with the exception of French's figure, all the proportio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time, the percentage of student speaking French's and other languages were a...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...ained stable at 10%. The rate of person who able speak Spanish rose slight to 35%. At th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10309278351 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91039527903 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8253544337 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417730652232 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189880045321 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785803081986 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270750715938 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462089926343 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.