the two pie charts present data of native learners in a British university that spoke other languages than English for year 2000 and 2010.
Clearly, the German speakers remained the same than the other languages that accounted ups and downs throughout the period. Also, Spanish was most spoken language after English.
As is visible, in year 2000 Spanish speakers were in great numbers(30%),the trend was same in 2010 but with a 5% increase. The similar rise can be seen in the population of those who used any other language than the given or two languages with English from 15% and 10% in 2000. Only 10% of total used German which remained the same across the period.
Whereas, the proportion of students using French and only English got decreased in the ten years span from the 20% and 15% in 2000, respectively and remained to a same as to German's.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home, leisure, and work activities. To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 56
- Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel. For this reason, attention should be given to colour schemes decorating places as offices and hospitals.How true is this statement? How far colour influence people health and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the two pie charts present data of native l...
^^^
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent data of native learners in a British university that spoke other languages th...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in great numbers30%,the trend was same in 2010 but with a 5% increase. The sim...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame in 2010 but with a 5% increase. The similar rise can be seen in the populati...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seen in the population of those who used any other language than the given or two...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000. Only 10% of total used German which remained the same across the period. ...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...10% of total used German which remained the same across the period. Whereas,...
^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al used German which remained the same across the period. Whereas, the propo...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lish got decreased in the ten years span from the 20% and 15% in 2000, respective...
^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000, respectively and remained to a same as to Germans.
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spectively and remained to a same as to Germans.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77852348993 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44319270157 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0636058699 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238987443195 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110438603052 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764887734256 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156350666789 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588792423017 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.