The charts below show qualification of graduates working in one advertising company in the year 1990 and 2010
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of people graduating in six different types pff degrees in an advertising firm in two years, namely 1990 and 2010.
In general, there were noticeable changes in the proportion of workers having Ph.D.- In art, Ph.D.- in Science, while a constant trend if we look at the figure for Master degree- Science. It is also clear that the figure for Master Art was the highest among six qualifications in 1990; however, that for First degree- Art was larger than for any other in 2010.
At the beginning of the period, 27% of employees in the company had a Master degree Art, compared to only 18% First degree Art and 8% Ph.D. -Art. Over the following 20 years, this company saw the proportion of workers having Master degree Art decrease sharply, to 12%. In addition, the percentage of employees having PhD Art dropped to 7%; however, the figure for First degree Art increased to a peak of 27%.
In 1990, workers with Master degree Science accounted for 20% of the total people in the company, while the figure fir First degree Science and PhD Science were lower, at 18% and 9% respectively. After 20 years, the proportion of workers having Master degree Science did not change significantly, remaining at 20%. Furthermore, the percentage of employees having First degree Science rose to 24%, and the figure for PhD Science increased to 12 %
- Today fewer elderly people live with their children than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure This money should be used in new housing and road development Dou you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people s prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people To what extent do you agree or disagree 49
- The graph shows information about types of accommodation of people on holiday in the UK 1985 1995 and 2005 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ir First degree Science and PhD Science were lower, at 18% and 9% respectively. Afte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83474576271 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60432249974 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3274723904 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771606344399 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419329427979 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619823991781 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747896337487 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746550558655 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ir First degree Science and PhD Science were lower, at 18% and 9% respectively. Afte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83474576271 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60432249974 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3274723904 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771606344399 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419329427979 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619823991781 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747896337487 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746550558655 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.