Many educators believe that international exchange trips are beneficial for students. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that foreign exchange programs are beneficial for students. While there might be some opposing arguments, I still agree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems unreasonable simply because participating in international exchange trips may have negative impacts on the social lives of students. For example, It is difficult for many Vietnamese to integrate into new societies, such as the US, the UK, and Australia, because of cultural differences between Asia and Western countries. As a result, some of them fall into social isolation, which might lead to depression and other mental diseases
In spite of the arguments above, I highly support this view for the following reasons. Firstly, Taking part in foreign exchange programs could make students more independent. For instance, many students who live apart from family have to do a wide range of activities, including cleaning, cooking, or managing money by themselves. As a consequence, they will be better prepared for new challenges in the future. Another reason is that studying overseas is an ideal way to improve their foreign languages. To illustrate, these students who live in Australia, The USA, and the UK tend to have a good environment to study and practice English and other languages with many native speakers every day. Thus, They are more likely to improve their study performance and job opportunities in the long run.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to argue against the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe that students take advantages of foreign exchange programs. To be more specific, these trips could make students more self-reliant and enhance their foreign language
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-09 | Vadesaer | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | quynhnhi280103 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | vuongngantrannguyen | 71 | view |
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure This money should be used in new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 56
- These charts below show the percentage of residential water use for five aspects in the UK in 1988 and 2008 67
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- the maps below show the changes of the community centre 10 years ago and at present 73
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34172661871 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85280828084 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7368308826 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256972376423 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832716962947 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528750271191 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150680335152 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389783809908 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.