The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

These two diagrames show the reasons why people choose to travel to work by bycicle (health and fitness, less pollution, no parking problems, no costs, faster than driving) and reasons why people prefer to travel to work by driving a car.
First diagrame illustrates thar reasons like health and less pullution are most popular, so they are equal (30%). The second by popularity reason is "no parking problems (15%). A little number of people (13 %) said that driving the bycicle they do not have so much costs comparing those who drive the car. There are just 1 % difference between "no costs" reason and "faster than driving".
The second diagrame shows that 40% of population who drives the car considere that driving your auto is more comfortable than driving a bycicle. The revearse reason of this diagrame is "safer than cycling" (11%). The equal percentage of people think that car is faster than cycling and car helps to carry things to work.
Overall, more people prefer comfort than cycling and most people choose cycling because of health, comparing the speed of bycicle that are less popular.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...driving the bycicle they do not have so much costs comparing those who drive the car...
^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is 'safer than cycling' 11%. The equal percentage of people think that c...
^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...ort than cycling and most people choose cycling because of health, comparing the speed ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11351351351 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58219563142 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.790695928 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16329240813 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749010047659 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710971532114 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120049907439 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815210030959 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.