The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.
The given chart potrays the information regarding the reasons behind adult study and the following pie chart reveals the mentality by which its costs should be divided. The prime cause was intrest in subject and to meet people stands at bottom.
To begin with, grownups prefer intrest in subjects to persue their study which figures for 40% as also the prime cause. Qualifications do matter in this field as it stands first runner up accounted for 36%. Meanwhile, for enjoying learning or studying 20% of people claim as their reason. On the same page, 22% of people show study to support their jobs. At the bottom, meeting people also turnout to be the reason for study for 9% of people.
Moving on, provided pie chart displays that the highest ones are individuals to share the expense of course accounted for 48% whereas taxpayer contribute least amount of 25%. Employers should carry 35% of cost according to people's preception.
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.Write a report for a university lecturer, desc 100
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contribute the least'.
Suggestion: contribute the least
...urse accounted for 48% whereas taxpayer contribute least amount of 25%. Employers should carry 3...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94303797468 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41981650899 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670886075949 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5421325539 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213859675592 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814897532671 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082787067796 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149502571981 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761347007945 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.