The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010

The pie chart gives information about the rating the Parkway Hotel services by their 100 customer in asked questions from them. The year under consideration between 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is crystal clear that maximum percentage of customers of the Parkway Hotel rate satisfactory in previous year while excellence rater were the lowest, but in last year hotel get rating of good from the highest proposition of guests and very poor was recorded the minimum rate.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that in 2005, rating of satisfactory from guests of the Parkway Hotel was registered the highest percentage that accounted about 45%. It was following by poor and very poor, having proposition of 21% and 15%, respectability.
14% was recorded in case of customer those rate good. However, excellent was negligible by 5%.
Moving further, in 2010, percentage of rating good and excellent by guests of the Parkway Hotel were slightly increase by 25% each. Moreover, satisfactory(17%) and very poor(4%) and poor(12%) rating were declined.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by their 100 customer in asked questions from them. The year under consideration ...
^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...excellence rater were the lowest, but in last year hotel get rating of good from ...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ests of the Parkway Hotel were slightly increase by 25% each. Moreover, satisfactory17% ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15697674419 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76491848022 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 75.6189276717 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334997568024 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138037047721 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838805512082 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199266892955 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744726356385 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by their 100 customer in asked questions from them. The year under consideration ...
^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...excellence rater were the lowest, but in last year hotel get rating of good from ...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ests of the Parkway Hotel were slightly increase by 25% each. Moreover, satisfactory17% ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15697674419 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76491848022 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 75.6189276717 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334997568024 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138037047721 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838805512082 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199266892955 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744726356385 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.