The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two bar charts demonstrate the percentage of energy utilizing in the UK and the USA in 2006 and 2009.
In two years, oil, on average, remains the highest of all types of energy in both countries. Oil reached 37 percent in the USA in 2000, accompanying with 28 percent of which in the UK; meanwhile, oil increased marginally (about 2 percent) for each in 2006.
Besides, the second lowest and the lowest in both years are nuclear power and other renewable sources. While the USA's consumption seems to be the same (about 5%), the UK's dropped about 10 percent, ending at 5 and 7 percent in 2006.
The two others, coal and gas, have fluctuated wildly. At the year 2000, coal's percentage is way higher than those of gas, with 30% and 33% compared to 20% and 11% of the UK and the USA. The picture swaps their places 6 years later, with gas's consumption, on average, easily outnumber coal's. Although gas and coal share quite the same figure, the percentage of gas consumption triples that of coal in the UK.
Overall, the using amount of fossil fuels is extremely higher than those of renewable energy sources.
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60913705584 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47251374696 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7434104033 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163264257566 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643036312137 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635620797837 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100266231894 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603217473789 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60913705584 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47251374696 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7434104033 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163264257566 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643036312137 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635620797837 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100266231894 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603217473789 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.