Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families. This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today's world, there are some major changes in people's lives. An increasing number of people want to live with their friends, or like being alone better than living with their family member; hence, some residents attach it to adverse communities' impact. From where I stand, I utterly agree with this statement.
First and foremost, this trend can badly affect families' bonds. As you may know, when members live far away from their family, they will gradually not sympathize or understand the feeling, the hard work, of other members. They will consider their family as social friends, as they can't have many conversations with them. This can loosen the connections between not only them with their families, but also those families with the society - a extreme consequence.
Secondly, living alone or with friends can trigger some money-related problems; therefore, it breeds social evils. Truthfully, staying in a cozy house with families certainly doesn't cost an arm and a leg like living in a flat. The more expensive the cost of living is, the more money you need to get out of a financial burden. In many cases, people have to rob, burgle others in order to satisfy all their need - a striking feature of social evils. HCM City is a telling example. As you may see, the proportion of family living separated from each other have the tendency to become robbers, burglars, thieves, leading to the existing intriguing problems.
Nevertheless, some people might say that living alone helps people become independent. This, surprisingly, is completely false. Albeit they are independent, they are unreliable - a result which is unwanted for all parents and spouse.
In sum, I significantly disagree with the viewpoint living far away from families for two reasons: bad families' bonds and social evils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-02 | Ice Age Mysterious | 79 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | Vivek chovatiya | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | Asma Fauziah | 92 | view |
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...their family as social friends, as they cant have many conversations with them. This...
^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... also those families with the society - a extreme consequence. Secondly, living...
^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in a cozy house with families certainly doesnt cost an arm and a leg like living in a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63527743819 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4467723343 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8235294118 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414232036153 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12112298093 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846636881957 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22130306846 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947647537679 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.