The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
The pie charts compare the proportion of spending patterns in us 1966 and 1996. Overall, it can be seen that the greatest change was the percentage of spending patterns was car and the most reduced was food.
In 1966, 44% food was the most favorite pattern, but in 1996, this fell significantly to only 14%. The second popular item was car, representing just over a quarter all of types, this increase constantly more than a third twenty years later. Initially, pattern on the restaurant was fairly low at only 7%, However, this kind raised dramatically over the 30 years later to represent the minority of type at 14%. Furthermore, at 1% computer was very small number in 1966 but it advanced one in ten in 1996.
Reduction of items were seen in the remaining three spending patterns in 1996. The type of book decreased one in twenty, the second category was furniture which decline at 8% and the last petrol got 8%.
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat 56
- The table below gives information on the proporion on the carbohydrate, protein and fat in three different diet. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 89
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oportion of spending patterns in us 1966 and 1996. Overall, it can be seen that t...
^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was fairly low at only 7%, However, this kind raised dramatically over the 30 yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67901234568 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55633077048 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0156209331 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230011230901 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136238653283 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154534262466 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177168172152 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909227803911 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.