The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The charts compare the number of graduate and postgraduate who did not into full-time work after leaving college in four types of groups in the United Kingdom in 2008.
In general, there were increased sharply in further study in the people who graduate in the United Kingdom in 2008, while the further study has same situation for students who postgraduates in the United Kingdom in same year.
As can be seen, the student who graduated after college either selected part-time work, voluntary work, further work or Unemployment. Further work has maximum number of students with 29665 who selected this work. After that they selected par-time work with 17737 and unfortunately 16235 students did not have any job and the voluntary work have minimum number into groups of graduate and postgraduate in the United Kingdom in 2008. In postgraduate people further work have increased more than other groups. It has 2725 employees and after that part-time work with 2535 employees. Unemployment’s located in third place with 1625 in the United Kingdom in 2008.
Totally the number of students in graduate was more than postgraduate.
- The charts below what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 67
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68746924953 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469945355191 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6802996485 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393107439393 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180734914376 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139702134561 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256231198733 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170968065531 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.