The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The bar graph provide information about how many UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not choose full-time work after leaving college in 2008.
Overall, it can be clearly seen from the chart that the number of UK graduate and postgraduate students selected for the further study was the highest, with 29,665 students and 2,725 students respectively. In contrast, the figures of UK graduate and postgraduate students to make their choices for the voluntary work was the lowest.
Looking at the first chart shows that the number of graduate students who is selected by the further study was the highest, with 29,655 students, followed by the amount of students who is went into the part-time work, with 17,735. The figure for the voluntary work was four times lower than that of the unemployment, with 16,235 students. Finally, the voluntary work chose the least number of students, with only 3,500.
In the chart of postgraduate students choice, the number of students who is chose for the further study was the top selection, with 2,725, followed by the quantity of the part-time work with 2,535 students. The figures for the unemployment was four times more higher than that of the voluntary work. Finally, the voluntary work was selected the lowest number of students, with only 345.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e chart of postgraduate students choice, the number of students who is chose for ...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... choice, the number of students who is chose for the further study was the top selec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...res for the unemployment was four times more higher than that of the voluntary work. Finall...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07476635514 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59735751283 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434579439252 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7479071137 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325758585202 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157009505037 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135354480051 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254406741813 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140234447122 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.