The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given bar chart illustrates the information about the proportion of graduates and postgraduates in UK students who spent all the time to go to work after finishing their degree in 2008.
In general, the most popular destination for both groups is that they also choose to pursue further education whereas the volunteering was the least popular destination among the four mentioned ones.
Starting with 29,655 the ratio of maximum graduates did not go into full-time work opted for higher study while some of 17,735 select to go for part-time work. A slightly lower than this rate was 16,235 were unemployed while a small proportion showed interest in voluntary work, roughly 3500 in totals.
Turning to postgraduates, taking higher education was the most favorite destination with 2,725 students, followed by part-time work with 2,535 post-grads. Only 345 students did voluntary work. The difference in number between those who took part in part-time jobs and those who were not employed was minimal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | Muhammad Ashraf | 56 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using an online dictionary in language class 76
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 84
- THE BAR CHART BELOW ILLUSTRATES THE USE TOBACCO PRODUCTS BY SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES 73
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom. 73
- The number of International visitors going to Australia continues to grow making the Australian government very aware of the importance of its tourism industry The chart below shows the spending pattern of these visitors while they are in Australia 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74521378952 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7563206077 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258026615643 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119463223097 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102516453652 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150741520368 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105763113651 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.