The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The given charts illustrates the different types of work (except for full-time job) that graduate and postgraduate students in the UK did after graduation in 2008.
Overall, further study was the student’s first choice after they left school, while the least number of students chose voluntary work. Additionally, part-time job stood at the second rank in both two figures.
In 2008, almost 100% graduate students continued to learn after leaving college, followed by part-time work that 17735 students chose it. In the year, more than a half the graduate students could not find a job and became unemployed. Not be chosen by many students, the number of students did voluntary work was 3500 students.
At the same time, regarding postgraduate student, a similar pattern compared to above group of students could be seen in further study, while roughly 100% students did it after school time. About one in six students said that they had a part-time job in 2008. The figure for unemployment and voluntary work were 1625 students and 345 students respectively.
- Nowadays many animals species are on the verge of extinction due to humans’ activities on land and in sea. Why? Solution? 89
- The chart below shows the number of male and female research students studying six-related subjects at a UK university in 2009 84
- Organized tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment? 84
- The civic centre will be planned to change There are two maps one is the existing and the other is the plan for new 82
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24855491329 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72560362105 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1486562215 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366503669541 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162053490645 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119487393449 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264629801031 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123168186792 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.