The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given two pie charts illustrate, the different situations which people used to bicycle or car for work. There are five various reasons mentioned for both vehicles.

Overall, car users account for near half percentage of given chart with the reason of comfort. Whereas, bicycle usage was comprised of same percentage with 30% for transportation by the health and fitness and less pollution facts.

On the one hand, there was no parking problem like cars so 15% of people was bicycle users. While, 14% of employees use car because of which is faster than cycling and take more things needed for work. 13% of people owns bicycle by the reason that no costs.

On the other hand, 12% of people make use of bicycle which is faster than driving. Like wise, 11% of commuters use car because which safer as compared to cycling. Moreover, people living in distant region who use car for work with the proportion of 21.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (259 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WAS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'consisted of' or 'was composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; consisted of; was composed of
...ason of comfort. Whereas, bicycle usage was comprised of same percentage with 30% for transport...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as comprised of same percentage with 30% for transportation by the health and fi...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage with 30% for transportation by the health and fitness and less pollution fa...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f commuters use car because which safer as compared to cycling. Moreover, people l...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79874213836 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34698240537 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9076406467 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199946486856 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912577692825 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468842236115 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132858208837 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311437044362 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.