The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table describes the total count of visitors in an Ashdown Museum in a year before and after renovation. Whereas, the pie chart illustrates, the report of visitors opinion during the same periods. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, after modification, the total amount of visitors increased than before. Similarly, the guests also exhibit more satisfied reports after the refurbishment.
With regards to the table, there were 74,000 people visited the museum before renovation which is escalated to 92,000 after the year of refurbishment.
Regarding the pie chart, before modification, only 15% of visitors claimed that very satisfied in the museum and 40% of tourists was given dissatisfied report. While, after renewal, the proportion was changed to 35 and 15 respectively. Likewise, before, satisfied visitors accounts for 30% which surged to 40% after the year. In addition, people who represent very dissatisfied was 10% before which declined to 5% after the modification. Nevertheless, 5% of visitors have not been response to the survey during the years.
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say it is the government s responsibility to fund school buses while others think parents should be responsible for bringing their kids to school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53614457831 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99509082051 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4861510785 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5454545455 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348945682561 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124905856061 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729939454598 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203904917367 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762568358385 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.