The pie charts depict a range of reasons why bicycle and car are people’s main ways of commuting to work.
Overall, people cycle to work mainly by courtesy of improving their health and fitness or mitigating the pollution. As for those who prefer to drive to their office, the main reason why they choose this mode of transport is because of the comfort that driving a car can bring.
As per the chart of cyclists, those who think cycling does not cause any parking problems halved those who give the aforementioned reasons by 15%. Additionally, reasons with less prevalence are bikes being more economical and faster than cars, with each account for 13% and 12%, respectively.
On the contrary, the second most salient justification for why car commuters drive to work is because of the distance, which is merely one-half people with the most prevalent reason. An equal number of people choose cars over bicycles because they think the former is faster and some employees or workers have to carry things to work. Last but not least, safer than cycling is the least given reason which just crosses the 10% mark.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 80
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 89
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88020833333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45276005778 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7228249817 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232953704991 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112050071261 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926904585513 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172624564309 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102542497508 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.