The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001
The visuals reveal the information regarding the quantity of individuals per household in the UK and how these figures altered from 1981 to 2001.
From the value of 31% in 1981, there was a slight rise of 3% to reach 34% in the proportion of 2-person households in 2001, ranking first among examined categories. Similar changes, but to a greater extent, were seen in the proportion of households consisting of only 1 person, which was 17% in 1981 before witnessing the most significant change of all survey sized households, indicated by a proliferation of 9% to reach 26% in 2001.
Moreover, the percentage of 3-person households started at 20%, after which it experienced a tedious drop to conclude at 17% in 2001.
In 1981, around 18% of households in the UK contained 4 persons, while only 8% of that were 5-person households and just 6% of all households were 6-person households. In the subsequent 20 years, fewer households were recorded to consist of 4 persons, with figures winding down to end the period at 15%, which was much higher compared to that of 5-person and 6-person, witnessing the same trends, to finish at 6 and 2% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn about the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86802030457 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94977584943 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0686440323 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.833333333 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255237598732 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14240058374 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703608633541 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165534513728 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657816715369 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.