The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050.
The visuals reveal the information regarding the proportion of New Zealand population and how these figures have altered from 1950 to 2050.
Overall, despite some fluctuations, the 0-14 and 38-45 age group proliferated over the studied interval, while the reverse was apparent for that of the remaining age groups. Additionally, the data for people aged over 65 consistently had the highest figure throughout the period.
There was a significant proliferation in the value for over 65 age group, with figures increasing from around 60% in 1950 to peak at approximately 70% in 1990, but later this tendency was broken, followed by a moderate decline to reach 60% in 2000 before being expected to witness a slight dwindle to finish at around 57% in 2050. Conversely, from the value of 24% in the starting year, there was initially a spike to hit the peak at nearly 50%, in the subsequent 60 years, the growth pattern reversed until the end of the period, indicated by a shrink to conclude at roughly 40%.
The data for the 25-37 age group started at around 20%, after which it underwent a period of volatility to reach 18% in 1990, before decreasing dramatically to bottom at 0 in the ending year. It was not the case for the 0-14 age group, however, when its figure accounted for about 5% in 1950, with a subsequent 40 years drop gradually to reach just 1% in 1990 and a final period of swell to conclude at 20% in 2050.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 56
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70069916873 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0462725649 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.857142857 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.7142857143 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113904709252 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687631455633 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105205847712 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105958536513 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124332231251 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.