The charts give information about world forest in six different regions.
The pie chart illustrate figure for world forest in six different areas.
Overall, South America is the region consuming timber most while Africa is opposite. However, the proportion that forest makes up in Africa is the highest, and Asia is the region which contributes least forest to the world.
It is easily seen that Africa is the place where the figure for world forest makes up highest, at 27%, followed by Russia and North America whose proportion of forest contribution are the same, at 25%. South America, Asia and Europe are the three areas that have the similar figure for world forest, which are 16%, 14% and 18% respectively.
Regarding the second chart, the proportion of timber used in South America accounted for the highest, at 33%. Also, North America is the second highest region using timber most, just 3% lower than that of South America. Russia, Europe and Asia are the next three areas which consumed timber at the average rate, which are 23, 20 and 18 percent respectively. Africa is the region which makes use of wood least.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 11 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view | |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in four different countries in 2008 57
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions 68
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contributes the least'.
Suggestion: contributes the least
...e highest, and Asia is the region which contributes least forest to the world. It is easily seen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30495976238 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0505281011 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205567719251 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108499873666 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103885954272 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181682067292 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112378861079 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.