The three given charts present what secondary school students in Australia do after they graduate over a twenty-year period starting in 1980.
Overall, there are three options for Australian graduates which consist of unemployment, employment and further education. Additionally, graduates gradually tended to choose to become employees rather than go to further education.
At the first glance at the charts, in 1980, it is obvious that haft of the total number of Australian students took further education after graduating from secondary school. In 1990, the figure decreased to 38% and in 2000, it was 37%. In other words, further education in Australia seemed to be less necessary to a part of secondary graduates.
By contrast, in 1980, 40 per cent of the total graduates engaged in employment. In 1990, the rate rose to 50% and continued increasing to 55% in 2000. Accordingly, Australian graduates were prone to working and earning money rather than getting a higher qualification. Besides, the unemployed proportion in 1980 was 10%, this rate slightly increased to 12% in 1990 and declined to 8% in 2000. These statistics partly reflected that unemployment was not a warning problem for Australian graduates over the period of 20 years.
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2000 and 2010 and by level of education for the year 2002 and 2010 73
- A growing number of people work by telecommuting that is the employee works from home using a computer and the Internet to connect with the office What are the advantages and disadvantages of working this way 56
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment Only governments and large companies can make a real difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, if, second, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11055276382 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89750678464 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 199.0 22.4926829268 885% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1017.0 112.824112599 901% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 199.0 22.9334400587 868% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 55.0 5.23603664747 1050% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102213128074 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102213128074 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769123242834 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556568181025 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 102.1 13.2329268293 772% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -122.05 61.2550243902 -199% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 79.7 10.3012195122 774% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.54 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.0 8.06136585366 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 81.6 10.9970731707 742% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.0658536585 533% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.