The first chart illustrates how parents in England spent their money on their kid's sporting activities from 2008 to 2014 while the second one shows the number of children who participated differently in football, athletics and swimming.
Overall, the money used by parents in the UK increased steadily and strongly. At the same time, children extremely enjoyed football rather than athletics and swimming
Coming to the first line chart, the average sum of money that father and mother in Britain consumed for their children's sports facilities surged over the entire period. That started with 20 pounds per month in 2008 and soared to 32 pounds in 2014.
Turning to the second chart, it is visible that children participated mostly in football that in 2008, about 8 millions children joined and the number rose up to nearly 9 million in 2014. Meanwhile, there were only about half a million children participated in athletics and 2 million in swimming. In the next 6 years, the swimming and athletics figures both increased to nearly 3,5 million and 5 million respectively.
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on can come and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five years period 78
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66229412655 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1694163866 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437964474139 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174681195571 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14819574672 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24911364446 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112703811479 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.