The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The diagrams depict the average of years the adult spent at school and the highest qualification they have obtained in Singapore from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, adult males' years in school were higher than adult females’ years in all years from 2000 to 2010. Although the people who had high school qualification have reduced and the adults who got masters or had university qualification increased but the number of people finished the primary school has changed dramatically.
The number of years of schooling for adult males increased from 9 in 2000 to 12 in 2010, which means the number of years has rose by just under a third over time. While the years of education for adult females has witnessed a slight increase, with a leveling out in some years, it went up from 8 in 2000 to 9 in 2010. However, the total number of schooling for males and females has climbed over a period of ten years.
At the same time, primary qualification has dropped sharply from one quarter in 2000 to around 2.1% in 2010. It is clear that the secondary and the high school qualification decreased significantly, while the rate of university and master boomed steeply. Finally, the increase in the years of schooling for adult males, the university qualification rate increased significantly and the primary qualification rate dipped sharply.
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 56
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tained in Singapore from 2000 to 2010. Overall, adult males years in school wer...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imary school has changed dramatically. The number of years of schooling for adu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as climbed over a period of ten years. At the same time, primary qualification ...
^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mary qualification rate dipped sharply.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94642857143 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80482228692 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3378753195 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216939926579 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104995389119 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101664481844 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152182471485 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760744259411 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.