The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The bar chart shows the average number of years adults males and females spent at school between 2000 and 2010. While the pie charts represent the highest educational level of adults also, through ten years all of that at Singapore.

The bar chart explains that the average number of years that Singaporean men were spent at school rose regularly from more than 8 to nearly 12 years through ten years period. Moreover, the number of years which Singaporean women spent at school was stable in the first two years, 2000 and 2002 consequently start growth till reach to almost 8.5 years in 2010.

The pie charts give information about the Singaporean adult’s education level, in 2000 the number of adults who had university qualifications and master degrees were 8.3%, 7.5% then climbed to 32.93%, 30.31% respectively in 2010. On the other hand, the secondary school qualifications and high school qualifications were dropped from 26.3%, 32.31% to 15.2%, 19.55% sequentially through ten years.

In general, we can see that Singaporean men spent more time at school than women did, in addition, the educational level of adults increase at ten years period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-08-08 tata 78 view
2023-08-05 tata 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ten years all of that at Singapore. The bar chart explains that the average ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll reach to almost 8.5 years in 2010. The pie charts give information about th...
^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....3%, 7.5% then climbed to 32.93%, 30.31% respectively in 2010. On the other hand,...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...19.55% sequentially through ten years. In general, we can see that Singaporean ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14210526316 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65380613094 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.585820166 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4285714286 5.23603664747 295% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274009598646 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151140530091 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991434424778 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193698447058 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107919606781 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.