The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.
The pie charts give information about three different ways of learning English in three countries in the year 2010 and 2015.
Overall, studying in the evening was considered the most preferred in all the three countries.
In 2010, approximately 70% of people in country A and B chose evening class while the proportion of Country C was higher, at 94%. At the same time, online class accounted for 25% and 20% in Country A and B respectively. However, there were not any online classes in Country C in this year. In comparison, there were only small percentages of those who studied overseas to learn English in these three countries, ranging from 5 to 8%.
Five years later, both Country A and C experienced a slight decrease in the popularity of evening class, to 67% for the former and 82% for the latter, followed by a dramatic drop to just under a half (48%) in Country B. The rate of online class in Country B fell slowly by only 2% whereas studying online began at 3% in Country C. The figure for Country B remained at its level. All the countries witnessed upward trends in studying abroad. Noticeably, the rate of people learning English abroad in Country B went up suddenly to over a third (32%) compared to the other ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-07 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 79 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 84
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public spaces such as squared and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to even'.
Suggestion: to even
... 70% of people in country A and B chose evening class while the proportion of Country C...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a third 32% compared to the other ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60909090909 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64561074203 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559090909091 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0502015662 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31785703197 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126446605964 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136208797217 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234025792803 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185759151165 0.0819641961636 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.