The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010
The line graph illustrates how much money four restaurants in one city earned in the year 2010.
Overall, there are general upward trends in the earnings of Evening Paradise, Grand Fiesta and Delicacy, while Spicy Fortune restaurant experienced a reverse pattern.
Starting at 160,000 dollars, the income of Spicy Fortune saw downward fluctuations until October, followed by a steep decrease to around 50,000 dollars at the end of the year.
In comparison, 100,000 dollars was the total amount of money obtained at Grand Fiesta in January, which was twice as high as that of Evening Paradise. Afterward, the figure for Grand Fiesta dropped slightly by 20,000 in July and then rose gradually to just under 140,000 dollars in the following five months. Over the same time, the income of Evening Paradise increased twofold in July. After that, its figure showed a marked fall in September before going up suddenly to reach its peak of approximately 180,000 dollars. Regarding Delicacy, the amount of money that this restaurant gained varied constantly throughout the year, beginning at nearly 30,000 dollars and hitting its highest income of 120,000 in December.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | abcdefg892093 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | hnhung | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 47
- public park 78
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 79
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26344086022 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58611092327 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6893138038 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120812026044 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655603380473 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10567358823 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111550680745 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130887189567 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.