The pie charts show information about the differences of the origin of visitors in Australia and Germany in 1960 and 2010. Overall, the number of tourists from Asia increased in two countries. Meanwhile, European and British tourists indicated the reverse trends.
In 1960, the proportion of Asian tourists in Australia and Germany are the same at one in ten, whereas a half century later the tourism increased more than sixfold in Australia and became a quarter in Germany.
In terms of Western visitors, there had been significant falls of torusim from Europe in Australia, decreasing more than four-fifth visitors into 10% proportion in 2010, while in Germany they only decreased by 5%. The decreases of British visitors in Australia and Germany were 5 % and 14% respectively, which turned them to become unsignificant tourists. Lastly, Australia in the US perspective had become less popular, this contrasts to happening in Germany that indicated a slight positive trend.
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 11
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- Many processed food and ready made meals contain preservatives and chemicals What are the advantages to this Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3164556962 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88707333419 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5106321688 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0512836848959 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027064855518 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392737556933 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0387035152851 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311809861619 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.