The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the changes that have taken place in the means of transportation used to travel to a university in 2004 and 2009.
Overall, while in 2004, people mostly chose the car as their primary vehicle, it was the bus that was opted for the highest in 2009. The variation could come from fee charges applied for car parking in 2006 and the emergence of a new bus stop in 2008 in the university.
To begin with, car, bus, and bicycle were the top three methods commonly selected by individuals when coming to the school in both 2004 and 2009. Starting with 51% in 2004, the figure for those using cars decreased by 23% in the next 5 years. On the contrary, there was a slight increase in the usage of buses, from 33% in 2004 to 46% in 2009, making it the most common option. Likewise, an upward trend took place in the percentage of people who rode the bike to school, rose from 9% in 2004 to 16% in 2009.
Turning to trains, there was a small rise in its figure throughout 5 years, at 3% and 4% in 2004 and 2009 respectively. Meanwhile, despite objective reasons, including a new bus stop built in the university, the proportion of those who were interested in this travelling method still climbed over the period, from 4% to 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, still, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43043478261 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46487997077 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595652173913 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9008237976 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173036066124 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763642477963 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532246655502 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115557585612 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581856921255 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.