The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts reveal the data of the proportion of using five different means of transport to travel to one university in a 5-year period from 2004.
Overall, it is clear that among all the mentioned vehicles, car and bus were the two most prevalent means and most used by people. Meanwhile, citizens didn’t keen on traveling by train and walking.
In 2004, more than a half of people used car for commuting to school . Bus occupied the second highest position with a ratio that was only slightly lower than cars , at 33% . In the next 5 yeas, an opposite pattern occurred with these 2 figures. In detail, the number of car users decreased significantly to 28% , while a rise of more than 10% was seen in the proportion of those who traveled by bus
Moreover there were still a few people didn’t choose car or bus, instead, cycling, walking and going by train were their means of transport. Just about 3% and 4% citizens preferred to go to university by train and walking respectively. These numbers finally slightly climbed up to 4 and 6% . However, they were still the least popular means of transport used.
In addition, only 9% of commuters enjoyed riding a bike , which was about three times the percentage of train passengers. In the final year . the rate of bike rider also increased by 7%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... people used car for commuting to school . Bus occupied the second highest positio...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o that was only slightly lower than cars , at 33% . In the next 5 yeas, an opposit...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s only slightly lower than cars , at 33% . In the next 5 yeas, an opposite pattern...
^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...car users decreased significantly to 28% , while a rise of more than 10% was seen ...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of those who traveled by bus Moreover there were still a few people d...
^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... finally slightly climbed up to 4 and 6% . However, they were still the least popu...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ly 9% of commuters enjoyed riding a bike , which was about three times the percent...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e of train passengers. In the final year . the rate of bike rider also increased b...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...f train passengers. In the final year . the rate of bike rider also increased by 7%...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70742358079 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57183494051 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628820960699 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.3279529946 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9230769231 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934145591328 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314820713046 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480436892698 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584387283156 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620262654771 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.