The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart demonstrates information about what materials were used to produce electricity in 4 nations in 5 years since 2003, categorized by fossil fuel, hydropower, and nuclear power. Generally, fossil fuel was the most common fuel source that was consumed by all the countries. On the other hand, only Sweden used a large amount of nuclear power for electricity production.
According to the chart, 95% of hydropower is consumed in Morocco, which was the highest percentage compared to the three others, followed by 52% of Sweden’s proportion in the same period. The percentage of hydropower distributed in electricity produced was as three times as Vietnam’s, at 14% and over two-fourths, respectively. The Indians intended to use more fossil fuel for the electricity industry than other sources, with a majority of the percentage ( 82% total), at which point Vietnam invested over half of fossil fuel for electrical manufacturers ( 56%). However, the figures for both Swedish and Moroccan sources were comparable at a small fraction ( 4% and 5%). Furthermore, the most outstanding feature is the proportion of nuclear power distribution. Only two nations, India and Sweden, used those sources to provide electricity power, with 4% of the Indian source and 44% of the Swedish source in the 5 years in question.
In conclusion, fossil fuel ranked first in electricity production in India and Vietnam as well, whereas hydropower was the most common resource in Morocco.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | hxyav | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | hxyav | 67 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this and how can people research this 84
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is widening as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be taken to address those problems 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urces, with a majority of the percentage 82% total, at which point Vietnam invest...
^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fossil fuel for electrical manufacturers 56%. However, the figures for both Swedi...
^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces were comparable at a small fraction 4% and 5%. Furthermore, the most outstan...
^^
Line 3, column 932, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dish source in the 5 years in question. In conclusion, fossil fuel ranked first ...
^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as the most common resource in Morocco.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30341880342 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02555953823 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3874983158 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.1 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126657586416 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552627006617 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374882028009 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841017107264 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391218400627 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.