The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts make a comparison of four nations in terms of the proportions of the electricity production from three different sources between 2003 and 2008.
Electricity generated from fossil fuel the made up the largest percentages in Vietnam and India, while hydro power was the main source of electricity supply in Morocco and Sweden.
Electricity produced from fossil fuel occupied 82% of the total electricity production in India, the highest figure among the four nations. However, in Sweden, 52% and 44% were the figures of electricity production from the power of water and nuclear power respectively, remarkably higher than those of India, with only 14% and 4% correspondingly.
Turning to Morocco and Vietnam, two countries did not take advantage of nuclear electricity. The vast majority of the electricity manufactured from the power of hydro in Morocco, making up 95% of the total production, which was more than doubled that of Vietnam, at 44%. While the proportion of electricity produced from fossil fuel in Vietnam occupied 56%, the figure for Morocco accounted for only 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Pham Thi Nhung | 11 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the production of electricity from different sources in 4 nations 67
- Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them Education and training are better To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31428571429 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92710904254 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9016109797 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175962218132 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944248979699 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838690755803 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135674672156 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897586098022 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.