The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant-2
The pie charts make a comparison of four nations in terms of the proportions of the electricity production from three different sources between 2003 and 2008.
Electricity generated from fossil fuel the made up the largest percentages in Vietnam and India, while hydro power was the main source of electricity supply in Morocco and Sweden.
For India and Vietnam, the main source of material used to produce electricity was fossil fuel, with the former being significantly higher than the latter, at 82% and 56%. While the remaining of electricity production in Vietnam from the power of water contributed at 44%, this figure for India only occupied at 14%. By contrast, India took advantage of nuclear power to manufacture electricity, with the proportion recording at 4%, Vietnam did not use this resource.
Turning to the rest nations, hydro power played an important role in the production of electricity in Morocco and Sweden, with the proportions making up at 95% and at 52% correspondingly. Both countries used fossil fuel generating electricity, but the minority amounts, at 5% of Morocco and at 4% of Sweden. However, Sweden was seen as a country that the figure of nuclear electricity accounted for the highest rate in four nations, at 44%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Pham Thi Nhung | 11 | view |
- The line chart compares changes in the number of incidents happened in burglary, car theft and robbery crime between 2003 to 2012 in Newport city. 73
- How an island changed after facilities was built for tourism 78
- Cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain. 78
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant-2 73
- Percentage of students proficient in a foreign language in different countries in 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15609756098 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93042868103 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8974884405 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.125 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158155798852 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843654754334 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852761471726 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132229202858 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921314879332 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.