The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countriesin 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts illustrate three different sources of energy manufactured in four nations ( India, Sweden, Morocco, and VietNam) over a period of 5 years ( 2003-2008)
Overall, it is noticeable that Morocco and VietNam did not produce nuclear power during the period shown. The amount of hydropower accounted for the largest electricity production in Sweden and Morocco, while fossil fuel took up the highest percentage of electricity produced in two other countries.
Over four-fifths of electricity was produced by fossil fuel in India, followed by 56% of electricity production from this type of source in VietNam. However, the amount of this sector produced in Morocco and Sweden was around 5% each. The Vietnamese people manufactured nearly half of the electricity produced from hydropower energy, while this source production in Morocco was moderately higher, at 95%.
In India and Sweden, hydropower produced 14% and 52% respectively. Finally, nuclear power was the lowest energy in India, at 4%, whereas this figure for Sweden was the second primary source, at 44%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-22 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-22 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countriesin 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- Some people believe that a person s culture is defined by their country of origin while others believe that has only a minor influence Discuss both these views and give your opinion 95
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar
- The diagrams below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of energy manufactured in four nations India, Sweden, Morocco, and VietNam over...
^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...co, and VietNam over a period of 5 years 2003-2008 Overall, it is noticeable tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41916167665 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82098852586 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9803986352 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12645787419 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670285675442 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262334087464 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805906152948 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224155841819 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.