The charts show what Uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after college in 2008.
The given charts give information about what students who were currently studying further and who already graduated did after finishing studying except for working full-time in the UK in 2008.
For graduates, in 2008, studying further into a desired subject was the number one choice for various students with the number of 29665. Meanwhile, working voluntarily was not favored by many as only 3500 graduates chose to do. With 17735 students decided to be their destination, working part-time claimed the 2nd place, as 16235 students remained unemployed.
A similar pattern happened to postgraduates. In 2008, 2725 people decided to spend their time on an academic path, making it the most popular choice, whereas only 345 postgraduates wanted to be volunteers. Short by 190 people, part-time work came in close 2nd compared to the graduates' proportion. At the same time, there were 1625 postgraduates decided not to do any of the worked listed above.
Overall, for both graduates and postgraduates, further study was the most favorite choice while voluntary work remained unpopular.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-14 | lethianhthu | 89 | view |
- Write about the following topic Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today Are these shows a good method of finding talented people or are they just entertainment Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 86
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries. 73
- The tables compare working hours of full time and part time workers in Greece Netherlands and the UK compared to European average in 2002 82
- The maps show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3918128655 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83184681492 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2618856801 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332255467878 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116267296012 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112443416433 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195578576419 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134901975282 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.