The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
The bar chart evaluates the amount of metric tonnes pineapple that country A, country B and country C could export in millions in 2009 and 2019, and the pie chart compared the proportions of cost to the buyers each pineapple between 7 categories in 2019. Overall, the initial impression is that the most exported country in 2019 was country A and most of the cost was distributed to distribution & retail.
The amount of pineapples exports in Country A was about 1 millions in 2009, which was 3 millions fewer than that of exported pineapples in country B in the same year. However, between 2009 and 2019, a dramatically growth was witnessed in the number of pineapples metric tonnes exports, which stood at more than 10 millions. That number was about 5 times higher than that of produced pineapples exports in Country B, which was 2 millions. Meanwhile, Country C had witnessed an unremarkable amount of pineappple exports during the whole period.
In 2019, the proportions of the cost for producer and export costs was 5% and 4%, respectively. 12% of the funding was alloted for international transport, whichw as 2% higher than that of import licenses. Distribution & retail was the most funding category in 2019 with 35%, which doubled the proportions of the cost for profit. The distribution of the funding to the taxes accounted for 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Aashish Dhakal | 67 | view |
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for the government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 67
- Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 67
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for the government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...ar chart evaluates the amount of metric tonnes pineapple that country A, country B and...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...e year. However, between 2009 and 2019, a dramatically growth was witnessed in the number of pineapp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly growth was witnessed in the number of pineapples metric tonnes exports, which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94273127753 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85975194625 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466960352423 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8541873868 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364233684189 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160503605005 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133510128121 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269624685741 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12389077586 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...ar chart evaluates the amount of metric tonnes pineapple that country A, country B and...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...e year. However, between 2009 and 2019, a dramatically growth was witnessed in the number of pineapp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly growth was witnessed in the number of pineapples metric tonnes exports, which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94273127753 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85975194625 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466960352423 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8541873868 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364233684189 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160503605005 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133510128121 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269624685741 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12389077586 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.