Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
As the Internet becomes more and more accessible than ever before, meeting their friends online is a more preferable way to interact with others than face-to-face communication among a majority of youths. This propensity is inclined to happen by a couple of reasons and there are two solutions to tackle this problem.
To begin with, one of the reasons for this trend is the utility of the Internet. To be more specific, people can share their daily experiences, stories, information and send a text to others at the click of a button, which is more convenient when compared to physical interaction. Another reason to account for is that the Internet helps you build an incognito profile. In fact, people who are sensitive about their personal information often lean towards social medias because they can interact with the others without worrying about people knowing their true identity.
There are several feasible solutions that can be implemented to remedy this problem. Firstly, the government can diverts more funding to many social acitivites, which is the key to lowering the reliance on mobile phones. For instance, local authorities can organize a musical event for youths to encourage them meeting with their friends and strangers while staying away from smartphones. Secondly, parents should enforce a regulation about the time that their children could use electronic devices for online chatting. If childrens had consumed a considerable time on these devices, parents could either punish them or force them to do outdoor activites. Once youths are aware of the repercussions of using social medias too much, they would be nudged towards more physical socialize lifestyles.
To conclude, the utility of Internet and the ability of building incognito profile are the primary factors reasoning for youths preference for online socialising, and the aforementioned solutions should be universally adopted to encourage younger people meeting in person.
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for the government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 67
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 67
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for the government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'divert'
Suggestion: divert
...is problem. Firstly, the government can diverts more funding to many social acitivites,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41233766234 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79784051306 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4078396718 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202922668945 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070808621973 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337839776848 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12493937955 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127525142507 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.