The comparation among three pie charts to dicusse the most stuff percentage
The given pie chart provide three proportions of yearly fluctuating expenditures of UK school among 1981, 1991, and 2001. There are five tailored stuffs which consisting percentage change, Insurance, other workers’ salaries, resources e.g. books, furniture and equipment, and teacher’s salaries. More review would be state here.
In 1981, the most school expense held by teachers’ salaries which showcase 40% as the highest number. However, it gives a huge different with the percentage of Insurance that only present 2%. If we have a look in more detail, it also happen in 1991 and 2001. The great calculation was achieved by teachers’ salaries, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001, in opposite, The total of insurance accounted vice versa.
Furthermore, the amount of comparation between teachers’ salaries and insurance was surely clear. Teachers’ salaries almost hit a half of the total payment in every year mentioned, yet, the descriptions of insurance have no more than 8% among three diversity graphs. The comparative successes seen here.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
... we have a look in more detail, it also happen in 1991 and 2001. The great calculation...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% in 1991 and 45% in 2001, in opposite, The total of insurance accounted vice ve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., furthermore, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56097560976 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1613075236 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676829268293 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8594023229 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17781735496 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620809108563 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596546648385 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117209521988 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059588292265 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.