In the recent days, there is an enormous rise in the syllabus arduous. A host of people claim that children will have the favorable careers in the future if schools revoke music and sport classes. While I reckon that academic subjects are critical factor when serving to future careers, I believe that the other subjects are equally important.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that the academic jobs have the financial reward higher than the other jobs. There is a dramatic climb in the amount of time spend on studying academic subjects act as a catalyst for students to assimilate knowledge, enhance the faculty of information synthensis and marshal expertise to serve the future jobs. Students who learn conscientiously in academic subjects and have academic achievement in the curriculum, excelling in study skills and group work paves the way for having the jobs that ensures adequate income.
Nevertheless, Abrogating the music and sport classes lead students to face many heath warnings and social problem that cause inadequate development of pattern behavior and body physique. The head irritation and obesity is initiated impairment due to the strain of dismay studying syllabus, making children underperforming to achieve the lecture. Students who participate in sport and music class, ameliorating the pressure of study effect and get a subtle and sharp mind. It makes students become the spontaneous person, enrolling emotional intelligence that can beat the other job seekers.
In brief, although I agree that academic subjects play an integral part in students, I suppose that students can cram a good deal of knowledge and comprehend themself by studying other subjects
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 56
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 20
- The bar chart below shows the number of men and women studying engineering at Australian universities 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, then, while, i reckon, i suppose, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31343283582 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83060203202 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3741521051 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216899993323 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802869116263 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642681649403 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14160230151 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675054965471 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.