Describe changes of areas before and after hydroelectric damn built

Essay topics:

Describe changes of areas before and after hydroelectric damn built

The given map illustrates the construction development of area which the hydroelectric dam grew up.

In general, it was evident that this area passed through a significant revolution in the period from 1990 to 2010.

According to the diagram, in 1990, there was an irrigated farmlands located along the right side of river. The villages was built next to the land used for agriculture and between two mountains. The left side of the river is where the Acient structure located; furthermore, there was a small area for preserving rare animal and plant species. The forest was beside the ancient structure.

In 2010, after undergoing the building process of hydroelectric damn, there was various improvement made in the area . It could be manifest from the diagram that the agriculture land was replaced by the hydroelectric damn. Meanwhile, the villages were moved to the riverside and made room for a newly built hotel. In addtion, the past projects such as the reserve of rare plants and animals, ancient building were demolished for the power supply system. It was immuatably true that the half North of the river was reconstructed to be a lake surrounded by two mountain in the west north and east north of the region.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-13 phuongchi17899 78 view
Essays by user phuongchi17899 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...g the right side of river. The villages was built next to the land used for agricul...
^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eserving rare animal and plant species. The forest was beside the ancient structur...
^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...animal and plant species. The forest was beside the ancient structure. In 2010...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was various improvement made in the area . It could be manifest from the diagram t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while, in general, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81431594008 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4972563459 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157136869182 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649057731707 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751046358827 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941446307124 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453942073835 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.