the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort

Two maps show the changes of turning the fishing village to a hotel resort and the effect of development.

It is can be clearly seen that there are new roads have been added to connect the hotel resort with other cities which also have been created upon the new purposes. New buildings on the beach were created. In addition to the reclamation process of the behind mountains than the map of a fishing village. While, the farms were turned to natural parks which located in behind sanitation area. However, some maintenance was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the old village is still found on the second map of hotel resort of it. whereas, not only the fishing career is removed from the new target of village, also the agriculture sector is not be found in the map of hotel resort.
Overall, there are many different development changes have been added to turn the fishing village to a hotel resort.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the fishing village to a hotel resort and the effect of development. It is ...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ains than the map of a fishing village. While, the farms were turned to natural parks...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the ol...
^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...p of hotel resort. Overall, there are many different development changes have been added to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64880952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2890523121 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3050201026 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383136393548 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170889348091 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170854292295 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363052491112 0.15604864568 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115178559714 0.0819641961636 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.