The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000.
The diagram compares data about the total of parcels sent among two important e-mail service assotciations over the 80 years.
Overall, category for TNT was observed the highest level at the end of the survey. While, the least number of parcels were delivered on the Federal Express at the end of the three years.
From 1920 to 1940 years, Federal express mail service level rose considerably to reach about 23000. However, it became rapid fall to 11000 respectively. Over the three years, positive fegures observed that, it has experienced gradual rocket to 6000 nearbly than the last levels. After which, the major mail service of Federal express company figure remained relatively static from 1980 to 2000
According to TNT mail service level followed by a sharp soar to 11000 respectively compared to Federal express service. The fegures for TNT remained fairly steady over the two years. The greatest trend followed by a huge doubled to 23000 in 1980. Since then, it has been a substiantial treble so, now stood at almost 25000 at the end of the two years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...highest level at the end of the survey. While, the least number of parcels were deliv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l service level followed by a sharp soar to 11000 respectively compared to Federa...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
... by a sharp soar to 11000 respectively compared to Federal express service. The fegures...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99441340782 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44919667227 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.47781691 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248065648342 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835446572646 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916939990323 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151164454557 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750612430953 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.