Public transportation is a great way to travel, particularly within a metropolis. The merto is the most convinient way to get around a city. Do you agree or disagree?
Today,contemprory public transports one of the best way to go somewhere with a cost-effective money. While, as important as growing a variety of journeys are requiring to comprehensive machines. Despite this, I disagree this statement that, metro can not privade the highest comfort during travel. Moreover,it may not impact to visitors to sight on a group of attractive spaces when they prefer to stay in the railway.
On the other hand, majority underground rails have a greater attention is paid to address to going faster to destination. It is a much more convinient to visitors by this way.
In addition, it is important to everybody to play active role by reducing range of issues. In other word, some people can resemble a good deal of their time without waiting transport on outside. Also railways can not be desastrous to visitors while setting the metro will enter to regions step by step. In fact, New Zealand public underground rails systems have privated constantly to control every 2 minutes with the greatest-quality of approach. As a result, this favourable method could show effective result.
Rather, range of transports do not keep silence,amount of sounds will not arrange to be freedom during journey around a large city. Also,
It is difficult to exit to visitors to the majority faster transports. For instance, this type of hunans dificult to adopt to metro environments within humans' blood plessure, agitation, terror deseases.
In my personal experience, public underground railroads can not give an immence pleasure to tourist. Moreover, the effects of foriegners tendency can come both progression in negative and positive thoughts to travelling by metro.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , contemprory
Today,contemprory public transports one of the best way t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'cost-effective money'.
Suggestion: cost-effective money
...ne of the best way to go somewhere with a cost-effective money. While, as important as growing a varie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... somewhere with a cost-effective money. While, as important as growing a variety of j...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... highest comfort during travel. Moreover,it may not impact to visitors to sight on ...
^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e without waiting transport on outside. Also railways can not be desastrous to visit...
^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , amount
... range of transports do not keep silence,amount of sounds will not arrange to be freedo...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 118, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...stance, this type of hunans dificult to adopt to metro environments within humans blood ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28518518519 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06479859009 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3310501212 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126158750728 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372927919445 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488364215498 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617560359941 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313060931929 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.