The three provided maps depict the adjustment of West Park Secondary School over a period from 1950 to 2010.
Generally, it is readily apparent that West Park Secondary School contained fewer buildings during 1950 and was located near a residential area and agricultural land. In the year 2010, several amenities had been added for students and there was a notable addition of a large car park.
In 1950, 3 rows of houses were located to the left of the school, just above a large section of farmland and a playground attached to the school. 30 years later, which was 1980, there were significant alterations related to housing. The former houses were replaced by a car park and science block, and the farmland had vanished in favor of a sports field. The playground remained unchanged.
By 2010, the playground had been reduced in size in order to make room for a small sports field. The most noticeable shift by this time was the expansion of the car park overtaking the area previously occupied entirely by the sports field. Other structures were the same from 1980.
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table gives information about departments and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The chart below shows the average cost of the monthly contract for four di erent mobiles cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57238658284 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8730962859 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121199248165 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469057356567 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522643386166 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087359643906 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468337193173 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.