The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture illustrates how cutting tools were enhanced in the Stone Age. Overall, after 0.6 million years, the primitive tool was changed in various aspects such as age, dimension and appearance. Another noticeable point is that tools have become thinner and sharper, and the changes of this tool also made it become more functional, being more suitable for people’s life.
Regarding the information of tool A in the past, this tool was founded around 1.4 million years ago, and the statistics of the diagram show that the height of this tool is 8 centimeters. It is almost a natural rock with its roughness in all edges, and the image shows its rudimentary shape with uneven surface and blunt edge.
Turning into tool B after six thousand years, the development of this tool is observed via having a clearly teardrop shape with a rounded base and a pointed tip.It is also considered a highly symmetrical tool than that one in the past, with the edge more sharpened. Moreover, the way that people refined this tool also allowed it to become more smooth than the other one.
- The line chart below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The map below shows the changes that occurred to a town named willington in 1780 1860 and 2000 78
- the process illustrate how the recycled paper is made 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
.... Regarding the information of tool A in the past, this tool was founded arou...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86021505376 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48547636989 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5988945472 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165982906483 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085570115915 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574426454262 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115756710279 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274563468774 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.